On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 16:26, Thomas Huth wrote:
>
> On 8/23/19 4:32 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > As explained in commit aff39be0ed97:
> >
> > Both functions, object_initialize() and qdev_set_parent_bus()
>
> Commit aff39be0ed97 was not about qdev_set_parent_bus(), so the first
> senten
On 8/23/19 7:32 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> diff --git a/hw/arm/exynos4_boards.c b/hw/arm/exynos4_boards.c
> index f69358a5ba..2781d8bd41 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/exynos4_boards.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/exynos4_boards.c
> @@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ exynos4_boards_init_common(MachineState *machine,
> exy
On 8/23/19 4:32 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> As explained in commit aff39be0ed97:
>
> Both functions, object_initialize() and qdev_set_parent_bus()
Commit aff39be0ed97 was not about qdev_set_parent_bus(), so the first
sentence sounds somewhat misleading here. Maybe rephrase the commit
me
As explained in commit aff39be0ed97:
Both functions, object_initialize() and qdev_set_parent_bus()
increase the reference counter of the new object, so one of the
references has to be dropped afterwards to get the reference
counting right. Otherwise the child object will not be properly
