Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/7] softfloat: fallback to __int128 maths for s390x and others

2019-01-17 Thread Alex Bennée
Richard Henderson writes: > On 1/17/19 7:23 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: >> Apparently some versions of clang can't handle inline assembly with >> __int128 parameters, especially on s390. Instead of hand-coding the >> s390 divide provide a generic fallback for anything that provides >> __int128

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/7] softfloat: fallback to __int128 maths for s390x and others

2019-01-16 Thread Thomas Huth
On 2019-01-16 21:23, Alex Bennée wrote: > Apparently some versions of clang can't handle inline assembly with > __int128 parameters, especially on s390. Instead of hand-coding the > s390 divide provide a generic fallback for anything that provides > __int128 capable maths. > > Signed-off-by: Alex

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/7] softfloat: fallback to __int128 maths for s390x and others

2019-01-16 Thread Richard Henderson
On 1/17/19 7:23 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: > Apparently some versions of clang can't handle inline assembly with > __int128 parameters, especially on s390. Instead of hand-coding the > s390 divide provide a generic fallback for anything that provides > __int128 capable maths. > > Signed-off-by: Alex

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/7] softfloat: fallback to __int128 maths for s390x and others

2019-01-16 Thread Alex Bennée
Apparently some versions of clang can't handle inline assembly with __int128 parameters, especially on s390. Instead of hand-coding the s390 divide provide a generic fallback for anything that provides __int128 capable maths. Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée Cc: Thomas Huth ---