Richard Henderson writes:
> On 1/17/19 7:23 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Apparently some versions of clang can't handle inline assembly with
>> __int128 parameters, especially on s390. Instead of hand-coding the
>> s390 divide provide a generic fallback for anything that provides
>> __int128
On 2019-01-16 21:23, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Apparently some versions of clang can't handle inline assembly with
> __int128 parameters, especially on s390. Instead of hand-coding the
> s390 divide provide a generic fallback for anything that provides
> __int128 capable maths.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex
On 1/17/19 7:23 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Apparently some versions of clang can't handle inline assembly with
> __int128 parameters, especially on s390. Instead of hand-coding the
> s390 divide provide a generic fallback for anything that provides
> __int128 capable maths.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex
Apparently some versions of clang can't handle inline assembly with
__int128 parameters, especially on s390. Instead of hand-coding the
s390 divide provide a generic fallback for anything that provides
__int128 capable maths.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
Cc: Thomas Huth
---