On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 14 July 2011 10:41, Tsuneo Saito wrote:
>> stfa/stdfa/stqfa instructions should raise fp_disabled exceptions
>> if %pstate.PEF==0 or %fprs.FEF==0.
>
> Not really related to this patch but I happened to notice it:
> we generate a trap if d
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 14 July 2011 10:41, Tsuneo Saito wrote:
>> stfa/stdfa/stqfa instructions should raise fp_disabled exceptions
>> if %pstate.PEF==0 or %fprs.FEF==0.
>
> Not really related to this patch but I happened to notice it:
> we generate a trap if d
On 14 July 2011 10:41, Tsuneo Saito wrote:
> stfa/stdfa/stqfa instructions should raise fp_disabled exceptions
> if %pstate.PEF==0 or %fprs.FEF==0.
Not really related to this patch but I happened to notice it:
we generate a trap if dc->fpu_enabled is clear. That flag is set with:
dc->fpu_
stfa/stdfa/stqfa instructions should raise fp_disabled exceptions
if %pstate.PEF==0 or %fprs.FEF==0.
Signed-off-by: Tsuneo Saito
---
target-sparc/translate.c |9 +
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-sparc/translate.c b/target-sparc/translate.c
index
