Matthew Ogilvie mmogilvi_q...@miniinfo.net writes:
This patch provides a way to optionally suppress spurious interrupts,
as a workaround for systems described below:
Some old operating systems do not handle spurious interrupts well,
and qemu tends to generate them significantly more often
Il 27/08/2012 15:55, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
This patch provides a way to optionally suppress spurious interrupts,
as a workaround for systems described below:
Some old operating systems do not handle spurious interrupts well,
and qemu tends to generate them significantly more often
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
Il 27/08/2012 15:55, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
This patch provides a way to optionally suppress spurious interrupts,
as a workaround for systems described below:
Some old operating systems do not handle spurious interrupts well,
and qemu
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 07:40:36AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-08-23 08:24, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
This patch provides a way to optionally suppress spurious interrupts,
[snip]
I'm not sure why it only sporadically hits this sequence of events.
There doesn't seem to be other IRQs
On 2012-08-24 10:05, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 07:40:36AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-08-23 08:24, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
This patch provides a way to optionally suppress spurious interrupts,
[snip]
I'm not sure why it only sporadically hits this sequence of
This patch provides a way to optionally suppress spurious interrupts,
as a workaround for systems described below:
Some old operating systems do not handle spurious interrupts well,
and qemu tends to generate them significantly more often than
real hardware.
Examples:
- Microport UNIX System
On 2012-08-23 08:24, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
This patch provides a way to optionally suppress spurious interrupts,
as a workaround for systems described below:
Some old operating systems do not handle spurious interrupts well,
and qemu tends to generate them significantly more often than
