On 6/3/19 6:14 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 01.06.2019 3:06, John Snow wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/31/19 12:31 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> qcow2_reopen_bitmaps_ro wants to store bitmaps and then mark them all
>>> readonly. But the latter don't work, as
>>> qcow2_store_persi
18.06.2019 17:30, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 6/3/19 6:14 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> 01.06.2019 3:06, John Snow wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/31/19 12:31 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
qcow2_reopen_bitmaps_ro wants to store bitmaps and then mark them all
readonly. But t
01.06.2019 3:06, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 5/31/19 12:31 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> qcow2_reopen_bitmaps_ro wants to store bitmaps and then mark them all
>> readonly. But the latter don't work, as
>> qcow2_store_persistent_dirty_bitmaps removes bitmaps after storing.
>> It's OK fo
On 5/31/19 12:31 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> qcow2_reopen_bitmaps_ro wants to store bitmaps and then mark them all
> readonly. But the latter don't work, as
> qcow2_store_persistent_dirty_bitmaps removes bitmaps after storing.
> It's OK for inactivation but bad idea for reopen-ro.
qcow2_reopen_bitmaps_ro wants to store bitmaps and then mark them all
readonly. But the latter don't work, as
qcow2_store_persistent_dirty_bitmaps removes bitmaps after storing.
It's OK for inactivation but bad idea for reopen-ro. And this leads to
the following bug:
Assume we have persistent bitm
