On 07/16/2015 11:32 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Thu, 07/16 10:58, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>> On 07/15/2015 06:19 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
>>> eth_can_rx checks s->rxsize and returns false if it is non-zero. Because
>>> of the .can_receive semantics change, this will make the incoming queue
>>> disabled by
On Thu, 07/16 10:58, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 07/15/2015 06:19 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > eth_can_rx checks s->rxsize and returns false if it is non-zero. Because
> > of the .can_receive semantics change, this will make the incoming queue
> > disabled by peer, until it is explicitly flushed. So w
On 07/15/2015 06:19 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> eth_can_rx checks s->rxsize and returns false if it is non-zero. Because
> of the .can_receive semantics change, this will make the incoming queue
> disabled by peer, until it is explicitly flushed. So we should flush it
> when s->rxsize is becoming zero
eth_can_rx checks s->rxsize and returns false if it is non-zero. Because
of the .can_receive semantics change, this will make the incoming queue
disabled by peer, until it is explicitly flushed. So we should flush it
when s->rxsize is becoming zero.
Squash eth_can_rx semantics into etx_rx and drop
