On 7/25/19 2:06 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> John Snow writes:
>
>> On 7/24/19 12:47 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> John Snow writes:
>>>
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Let's add a possibility to query dirty-bitmaps not only on root nodes.
It is useful when
John Snow writes:
> On 7/24/19 12:47 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> John Snow writes:
>>
>>> From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
>>>
>>> Let's add a possibility to query dirty-bitmaps not only on root nodes.
>>> It is useful when dealing both with snapshots and incremental backups.
>>>
>>>
On 7/24/19 12:47 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> John Snow writes:
>
>> From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
>>
>> Let's add a possibility to query dirty-bitmaps not only on root nodes.
>> It is useful when dealing both with snapshots and incremental backups.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir
John Snow writes:
> From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
>
> Let's add a possibility to query dirty-bitmaps not only on root nodes.
> It is useful when dealing both with snapshots and incremental backups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> [Added deprecation information. --js]
>
On 7/17/19 1:39 PM, John Snow wrote:
> From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
>
> Let's add a possibility to query dirty-bitmaps not only on root nodes.
> It is useful when dealing both with snapshots and incremental backups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> [Added deprecation
On 7/17/19 4:05 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 7/17/19 2:21 PM, John Snow wrote:
>>>
>>> Is this worth squeezing into 4.1, to start the deprecation clock one
>>> cycle earlier (on the grounds that the missing information for anonymous
>>> nodes is a bug)? Or am I pushing the boundaries too far,
On 7/17/19 2:21 PM, John Snow wrote:
>>
>> Is this worth squeezing into 4.1, to start the deprecation clock one
>> cycle earlier (on the grounds that the missing information for anonymous
>> nodes is a bug)? Or am I pushing the boundaries too far, where keeping
>> this as 4.2 material remains the
On 7/17/19 3:13 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 7/17/19 12:39 PM, John Snow wrote:
>> From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
>>
>> Let's add a possibility to query dirty-bitmaps not only on root nodes.
>> It is useful when dealing both with snapshots and incremental backups.
>>
>> Signed-off-by:
On 7/17/19 12:39 PM, John Snow wrote:
> From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
>
> Let's add a possibility to query dirty-bitmaps not only on root nodes.
> It is useful when dealing both with snapshots and incremental backups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> [Added deprecation
On 7/17/19 1:39 PM, John Snow wrote:
> From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
>
> Let's add a possibility to query dirty-bitmaps not only on root nodes.
> It is useful when dealing both with snapshots and incremental backups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> [Added deprecation
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Let's add a possibility to query dirty-bitmaps not only on root nodes.
It is useful when dealing both with snapshots and incremental backups.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
[Added deprecation information. --js]
Signed-off-by: John Snow
---
11 matches
Mail list logo
