On 15/02/2019 14:52, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 14.02.19 13:14, Pierre Morel wrote:
A new CPU model facilities is introduced to support AP devices
interruption interception for a KVM guest.
This sentence is confusing. At first I thought you would introduce a new
_fake_ facility.
"Let's add
On 14.02.19 13:14, Pierre Morel wrote:
> A new CPU model facilities is introduced to support AP devices
> interruption interception for a KVM guest.
This sentence is confusing. At first I thought you would introduce a new
_fake_ facility.
"Let's add support for the AP-Queue interruption facility
On 15/02/2019 10:58, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 15.02.2019 10:53, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 14/02/2019 13:14, Pierre Morel wrote:
A new CPU model facilities is introduced to support AP devices
interruption interception for a KVM guest.
"APQI" for "AP-Queue Interruption" facility
The
On 15.02.2019 10:53, Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 14/02/2019 13:14, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> A new CPU model facilities is introduced to support AP devices
>> interruption interception for a KVM guest.
>>
>> "APQI" for "AP-Queue Interruption" facility
>>
>> The S390_FEAT_AP_QUEUE_INTERRUPT_CONTROL,
On 14/02/2019 13:14, Pierre Morel wrote:
A new CPU model facilities is introduced to support AP devices
interruption interception for a KVM guest.
"APQI" for "AP-Queue Interruption" facility
The S390_FEAT_AP_QUEUE_INTERRUPT_CONTROL, CPU facility indicates
whether the PQAP instruction with the
A new CPU model facilities is introduced to support AP devices
interruption interception for a KVM guest.
"APQI" for "AP-Queue Interruption" facility
The S390_FEAT_AP_QUEUE_INTERRUPT_CONTROL, CPU facility indicates
whether the PQAP instruction with the AQIC command is available
to the guest.
