On 25/01/2017 11:05, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 01/12/2017 05:45 PM, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> just a respectful poke to remind about this patchset :)
>
> Can you maybe resend/rebase the patch set? The target-s390x folder has moved.
I was reviewing it now. :)
Paolo
On 01/12/2017 05:45 PM, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just a respectful poke to remind about this patchset :)
Can you maybe resend/rebase the patch set? The target-s390x folder has moved.
Hello,
just a respectful poke to remind about this patchset :)
Claudio
Hi Paolo, I was wondering if you had seen this new version of the vCont
patchset, which I sent around last month -- is there any more work to do
or things to fix? or is it going to be upstreamed after 2.8?
(btw I just rebased it on 2.8.0-rc2 and it applied cleanly)
please don't keep me in suspense
This small patchset fixes the incorrect behaviour of the vCont command
in the gdb stub.
The first patch, as suggested be Paolo, refactors some code. The most
visible change is that it moves vm_start to cpus.c
The second one fixes the incorrect behaviour of the vCont command.
Previously, continu
