On 13/04/2017 15:21, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Paolo, maybe you want to submit a formal patch for 2.10? (Sorry for the
> confusion, these series of mine went a bit messy.)
Yes, will do. Or just submit the alternative fix that is mentioned in
the comment.
Paolo
On Thu, 04/13 14:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 11/04/2017 00:04, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:26:34AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> >> v3: Use bdrv_parent_drained_begin/end. [Kevin]
> >> Do it before releasing new_context. [Stefan]
> >>
> >> Fam Zheng (2):
> >>
On 11/04/2017 00:04, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:26:34AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
>> v3: Use bdrv_parent_drained_begin/end. [Kevin]
>> Do it before releasing new_context. [Stefan]
>>
>> Fam Zheng (2):
>> block: Make bdrv_parent_drained_begin/end public
>> block:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:26:34AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> v3: Use bdrv_parent_drained_begin/end. [Kevin]
> Do it before releasing new_context. [Stefan]
>
> Fam Zheng (2):
> block: Make bdrv_parent_drained_begin/end public
> block: Quiesce old aio context during bdrv_set_aio_context
>
v3: Use bdrv_parent_drained_begin/end. [Kevin]
Do it before releasing new_context. [Stefan]
Fam Zheng (2):
block: Make bdrv_parent_drained_begin/end public
block: Quiesce old aio context during bdrv_set_aio_context
block.c | 7 +--
block/io.c| 4 ++--
