Am 05.10.2017 um 21:02 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> During my quest to switch block status to be byte-based, John
> forced me to evaluate whether we have a situation during
> copy-on-read where we could exceed BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_BYTES [1].
> Sure enough, we have a number of pre-existing bugs in the
During my quest to switch block status to be byte-based, John
forced me to evaluate whether we have a situation during
copy-on-read where we could exceed BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_BYTES [1].
Sure enough, we have a number of pre-existing bugs in the
copy-on-read code. Fix those, along with adding a test.
A
