On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 10:22:13AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Thu, 08/01 14:28, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 06:13:53PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > Follow-up question:
> >
> > Did you look at using bdrv_ref() for the BDS <- BlockJob relationship
> > too?
> >
> > blockdev.c
On Thu, 08/01 14:28, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 06:13:53PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > BlockDriverState lifecycle management is needed by future features such as
> > image fleecing and blockdev-add. This series adds reference count to
> > BlockDriverState.
> >
> > The first t
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 06:13:53PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> BlockDriverState lifecycle management is needed by future features such as
> image fleecing and blockdev-add. This series adds reference count to
> BlockDriverState.
>
> The first two patches clean up two odd BlockDriverState use cases,
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 06:13:53PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> BlockDriverState lifecycle management is needed by future features such as
> image fleecing and blockdev-add. This series adds reference count to
> BlockDriverState.
>
> The first two patches clean up two odd BlockDriverState use cases,
BlockDriverState lifecycle management is needed by future features such as
image fleecing and blockdev-add. This series adds reference count to
BlockDriverState.
The first two patches clean up two odd BlockDriverState use cases, so all code
uses bdrv_new() to create BlockDriverState instance.
The
