On 08/05/2015 14:34, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > > Objection. None of the QOM patches have been reviewed by me and you knew
> > > I would be back today.
> >
> > No, I didn't. I didn't even know you were away, I thought you were
> > simply busy with something else.
>
> On the QOM CPU link<> threa
Am 08.05.2015 um 14:31 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> On 05/05/2015 17:37, Andreas Färber wrote:
Thanks, queued for 2.4.
>> Objection. None of the QOM patches have been reviewed by me and you knew
>> I would be back today.
>
> No, I didn't. I didn't even know you were away, I thought you were
> si
On 05/05/2015 17:37, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> > Thanks, queued for 2.4.
> Objection. None of the QOM patches have been reviewed by me and you knew
> I would be back today.
No, I didn't. I didn't even know you were away, I thought you were
simply busy with something else.
Paolo
Am 05.05.2015 um 12:33 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>
>
> On 01/05/2015 12:29, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> This series contains the 7 generic QOM API fixes and enhancements
>> that I previously posted as part of the large series refactoring
>> and extending the TLS support in QEMU:
>>
>> https://lis
On 01/05/2015 12:29, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> This series contains the 7 generic QOM API fixes and enhancements
> that I previously posted as part of the large series refactoring
> and extending the TLS support in QEMU:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-04/msg02038.html
This series contains the 7 generic QOM API fixes and enhancements
that I previously posted as part of the large series refactoring
and extending the TLS support in QEMU:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-04/msg02038.html
I'm sending it separately, since the patches are reasonab
