On 24.02.2016 10:28, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Max Reitz writes:
>
>> On 23.02.2016 10:48, Markus Armbruster wrote:
[...]
>>> Can you explain the *actual* difference between blk_backends and
>>> monitor_block_backends? "Actual" in the sense of difference in contents
>>>
Am 24.02.2016 um 10:28 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> Max Reitz writes:
>
> > On 23.02.2016 10:48, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Max Reitz writes:
> >>
> >>> On 22.02.2016 09:24, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Max Reitz writes:
>
Max Reitz writes:
> On 23.02.2016 10:48, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Max Reitz writes:
>>
>>> On 22.02.2016 09:24, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Max Reitz writes:
> On 17.02.2016 17:20, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 17.02.2016 um
Am 23.02.2016 um 14:52 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 23.02.2016 10:48, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > Max Reitz writes:
> >
> >> On 22.02.2016 09:24, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >>> Max Reitz writes:
> >>>
> On 17.02.2016 17:20, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
On 23.02.2016 10:48, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Max Reitz writes:
>
>> On 22.02.2016 09:24, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Max Reitz writes:
>>>
On 17.02.2016 17:20, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 17.02.2016 um 16:41 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> On
Max Reitz writes:
> On 22.02.2016 09:24, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Max Reitz writes:
>>
>>> On 17.02.2016 17:20, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 17.02.2016 um 16:41 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 17.02.2016 11:53, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 16.02.2016 um
On 22.02.2016 09:24, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Max Reitz writes:
>
>> On 17.02.2016 17:20, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Am 17.02.2016 um 16:41 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
On 17.02.2016 11:53, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 16.02.2016 um 19:08 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> The
Max Reitz writes:
> On 17.02.2016 17:20, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 17.02.2016 um 16:41 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>>> On 17.02.2016 11:53, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 16.02.2016 um 19:08 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> The monitor does hold references to some BlockBackends so it
On 20.02.2016 14:34, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 17.02.2016 17:20, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 17.02.2016 um 16:41 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>>> On 17.02.2016 11:53, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 16.02.2016 um 19:08 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> The monitor does hold references to some BlockBackends so it
On 17.02.2016 17:20, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 17.02.2016 um 16:41 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> On 17.02.2016 11:53, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Am 16.02.2016 um 19:08 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
The monitor does hold references to some BlockBackends so it should have
>>>
>>> s/does hold/holds/?
>>
>>
Am 17.02.2016 um 16:41 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 17.02.2016 11:53, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 16.02.2016 um 19:08 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> >> The monitor does hold references to some BlockBackends so it should have
> >
> > s/does hold/holds/?
>
> It was intentional, so I'd keep it unless
On 17.02.2016 11:53, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 16.02.2016 um 19:08 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> The monitor does hold references to some BlockBackends so it should have
>
> s/does hold/holds/?
It was intentional, so I'd keep it unless you drop the question mark.
>> a list of those BBs;
Am 16.02.2016 um 19:08 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> The monitor does hold references to some BlockBackends so it should have
s/does hold/holds/?
> a list of those BBs; blk_backends is a different list, as it contains
> references to all BBs (after a follow-up patch, that is), and that
> should
The monitor does hold references to some BlockBackends so it should have
a list of those BBs; blk_backends is a different list, as it contains
references to all BBs (after a follow-up patch, that is), and that
should not be changed because we do need such a list.
monitor_remove_blk() is
14 matches
Mail list logo