Hi,
I had time to investigate more on this problem.
On 16/05/2018 15:43, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Hi Bala,
>
> I've tested you patch migrating a pseries between a P9 host and a P8
> host with 1G huge page size on the P9 side and 16MB on P8 side and the
> information are strange now.
>
>
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 03:43:48PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Hi Bala,
>
> I've tested you patch migrating a pseries between a P9 host and a P8
> host with 1G huge page size on the P9 side and 16MB on P8 side and the
> information are strange now.
Hi Laurent,
Thank you for testing the patch,
Hi Bala,
I've tested you patch migrating a pseries between a P9 host and a P8
host with 1G huge page size on the P9 side and 16MB on P8 side and the
information are strange now.
"remaining ram" doesn't change, and after a while it can be set to "0"
and estimated downtime is 0 too, but the
Hi,
Dave, David and Juan if you guys are okay with the patch, please
help to merge it.
Thanks,
Bala
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:40:40PM +0530, Balamuruhan S wrote:
> expected_downtime value is not accurate with dirty_pages_rate * page_size,
> using ram_bytes_remaining would yeild it correct. It
expected_downtime value is not accurate with dirty_pages_rate * page_size,
using ram_bytes_remaining would yeild it correct. It will initially be a
gross over-estimate, but for for non-converging migrations it should
approach a reasonable estimate later on.
currently bandwidth and
