On 6/8/2016 6:46 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:21:06 +1200
"Huang, Kai" wrote:
On 6/7/2016 3:58 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 11:20:32 +0800
Peter Xu wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:02:11AM -0600, Alex
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:21:06 +1200
"Huang, Kai" wrote:
> On 6/7/2016 3:58 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 11:20:32 +0800
> > Peter Xu wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:02:11AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >>> On Mon,
On 6/7/2016 3:58 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 11:20:32 +0800
Peter Xu wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:02:11AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 21:43:17 +0800
Peter Xu wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 07:11:41AM
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 09:58:09PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 11:20:32 +0800
> Peter Xu wrote:
[...]
> > Only if cap_caching_mode() is set (which is bit 7, the CM bit), we
> > will send these invalidations. What I meant is that, we should allow
> > user
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 11:20:32 +0800
Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:02:11AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 21:43:17 +0800
> > Peter Xu wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 07:11:41AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:02:11AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 21:43:17 +0800
> Peter Xu wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 07:11:41AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 13:04:07 +0800
> > > Peter Xu wrote:
> >
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 21:43:17 +0800
Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 07:11:41AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 13:04:07 +0800
> > Peter Xu wrote:
> [...]
> > > Besides the reason that there might have guests that do not
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 07:11:41AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 13:04:07 +0800
> Peter Xu wrote:
[...]
> > Besides the reason that there might have guests that do not support
> > CM=1, will there be performance considerations? When user's
> > configuration
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 13:04:07 +0800
Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 03:14:36PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > On 2016-06-02 15:00, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 16:44:39 +0800
> > > Peter Xu wrote:
> [...]
> > >> There should be
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 03:14:36PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2016-06-02 15:00, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 16:44:39 +0800
> > Peter Xu wrote:
[...]
> >> There should be more than one way to make it optional. Which is
> >> better? What I can think of:
> >>
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 03:14:36PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2016-06-02 15:00, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 16:44:39 +0800
> > Peter Xu wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 06:42:03PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>> On 2016-05-21 18:19, Aviv B.D wrote:
On 2016-06-02 15:14, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2016-06-02 15:00, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 16:44:39 +0800
>> Peter Xu wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 06:42:03PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2016-05-21 18:19, Aviv B.D wrote:
> From: "Aviv
On 2016-06-02 15:00, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 16:44:39 +0800
> Peter Xu wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 06:42:03PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2016-05-21 18:19, Aviv B.D wrote:
From: "Aviv Ben-David"
This flag
On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 16:44:39 +0800
Peter Xu wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 06:42:03PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > On 2016-05-21 18:19, Aviv B.D wrote:
> > > From: "Aviv Ben-David"
> > >
> > > This flag tells the guest to invalidate tlb cache also after
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 06:42:03PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2016-05-21 18:19, Aviv B.D wrote:
> > From: "Aviv Ben-David"
> >
> > This flag tells the guest to invalidate tlb cache also after unmap
> > operations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aviv Ben-David
(CT RDA ITP SES-DE) [jan.kis...@siemens.com]; Jason Wang
[jasow...@redhat.com]; qemu-devel@nongnu.org [qemu-devel@nongnu.org]
CC: Alex Williamson [alex.william...@redhat.com]; Peter Xu [pet...@redhat.com];
Michael S. Tsirkin [m...@redhat.com]
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] IOMMU: add
What is the best way to add this configuration option?
Aviv.
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:25 PM Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2016-05-24 10:14, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On 2016年05月22日 00:19, Aviv B.D wrote:
> >> From: "Aviv Ben-David"
> >>
> >> This flag tells
On 2016-05-24 10:14, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2016年05月22日 00:19, Aviv B.D wrote:
>> From: "Aviv Ben-David"
>>
>> This flag tells the guest to invalidate tlb cache also after unmap
>> operations.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aviv Ben-David
>> ---
>
> Is this a guest
On 2016年05月22日 00:19, Aviv B.D wrote:
From: "Aviv Ben-David"
This flag tells the guest to invalidate tlb cache also after unmap operations.
Signed-off-by: Aviv Ben-David
---
Is this a guest visible behavior? If yes, shouldn't we cache
translation
On 2016-05-21 18:19, Aviv B.D wrote:
> From: "Aviv Ben-David"
>
> This flag tells the guest to invalidate tlb cache also after unmap operations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aviv Ben-David
> ---
> hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 3 ++-
>
From: "Aviv Ben-David"
This flag tells the guest to invalidate tlb cache also after unmap operations.
Signed-off-by: Aviv Ben-David
---
hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 3 ++-
hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1
21 matches
Mail list logo