On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 03:24:21PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 02:24:23PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>> According to SDM 10.11.1, only [19:12] bits of MSI address are
>> Destination ID, change the mask to avoid ambiguity for VT-d spec
>> has used the bit 4 to indicate a re
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 02:24:23PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
> According to SDM 10.11.1, only [19:12] bits of MSI address are
> Destination ID, change the mask to avoid ambiguity for VT-d spec
> has used the bit 4 to indicate a remappable interrupt request.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao
> Signed-off-b
According to SDM 10.11.1, only [19:12] bits of MSI address are
Destination ID, change the mask to avoid ambiguity for VT-d spec
has used the bit 4 to indicate a remappable interrupt request.
Signed-off-by: Chao Gao
Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu
Reviewed-by: Anthony PERARD
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu
---
