Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/9] KVM: Don't assume that mpstate exists with in-kernel PIC always

2013-06-12 Thread Alexander Graf
On 01.05.2013, at 03:48, Scott Wood wrote: From: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de On PPC, we don't support MP state. So far it's not necessary and I'm not convinced yet that we really need to support it ever. However, the current idle logic in QEMU assumes that an in-kernel PIC also means

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/9] KVM: Don't assume that mpstate exists with in-kernel PIC always

2013-06-12 Thread Scott Wood
On 06/12/2013 08:04:55 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 01.05.2013, at 03:48, Scott Wood wrote: From: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de On PPC, we don't support MP state. So far it's not necessary and I'm not convinced yet that we really need to support it ever. However, the current idle logic in

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/9] KVM: Don't assume that mpstate exists with in-kernel PIC always

2013-06-12 Thread Alexander Graf
On 12.06.2013, at 22:16, Scott Wood wrote: On 06/12/2013 08:04:55 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 01.05.2013, at 03:48, Scott Wood wrote: From: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de On PPC, we don't support MP state. So far it's not necessary and I'm not convinced yet that we really need to

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/9] KVM: Don't assume that mpstate exists with in-kernel PIC always

2013-04-30 Thread Scott Wood
From: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de On PPC, we don't support MP state. So far it's not necessary and I'm not convinced yet that we really need to support it ever. However, the current idle logic in QEMU assumes that an in-kernel PIC also means we support MP state. This assumption is not true