On Jun 01 16:59, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 1 June 2018 at 16:34, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> >> switch (extract32(id_isar0, 24, 4)) {
> >> case 1:
> >> set_feature(&features, ARM_FEATURE_THUMB_DIV);
> >> break;
> >> case 2:
> >> set_feature(&features, ARM_FEATURE_ARM_DIV);
> >> set_feat
On 1 June 2018 at 16:34, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> On Jun 01 09:57, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> No; V7VE always implies ARM_DIV. (ARM_DIV doesn't imply V7VE,
>> though, which is why it is a separate feature bit.)
>
> Okay, then I'm confused about some of the preexisting logic in
> kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_fe
On Jun 01 09:57, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 31 May 2018 at 21:39, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> > On May 31 15:18, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >>if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V7VE) {
> >>/* v7 Virtualization Extensions. In real hardware this implies
> >> * EL2 and also the presence of th
On 31 May 2018 at 21:39, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> On May 31 15:18, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V7VE) {
>>/* v7 Virtualization Extensions. In real hardware this implies
>> * EL2 and also the presence of the Security Extensions.
>> * For QEMU, fo
On May 31 15:18, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 May 2018 at 20:31, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> > On Apr 17 16:00, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> So, the underlying issue here is that there's a QEMU specific
> >> fudge going on. Architecturally, if the CPU implements the
> >> Virtualization Extensions, then:
>
On 17 May 2018 at 20:31, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> On Apr 17 16:00, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> So, the underlying issue here is that there's a QEMU specific
>> fudge going on. Architecturally, if the CPU implements the
>> Virtualization Extensions, then:
>> * it has Hyp mode
>> * it must also implemen
On Apr 17 16:00, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 April 2018 at 15:23, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> > On Apr 12 18:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> What's the difference between this and ARM_FEATURE_EL2 ?
> >
> > I use ARM_FEATURE_V7VE in a later patch to guard against implementing
> > PMOVSSET on v7 machines
On Apr 17 16:00, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 April 2018 at 15:23, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> > On Apr 12 18:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> What's the difference between this and ARM_FEATURE_EL2 ?
> >
> > I use ARM_FEATURE_V7VE in a later patch to guard against implementing
> > PMOVSSET on v7 machines
On 17 April 2018 at 15:23, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> On Apr 12 18:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> What's the difference between this and ARM_FEATURE_EL2 ?
>
> I use ARM_FEATURE_V7VE in a later patch to guard against implementing
> PMOVSSET on v7 machines which don't implement the virtualization
> extensi
On Apr 12 18:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 16 March 2018 at 20:31, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Aaron Lindsay
> > ---
> > target/arm/cpu.c | 3 +++
> > target/arm/cpu.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
> > index b0d03
On 16 March 2018 at 20:31, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lindsay
> ---
> target/arm/cpu.c | 3 +++
> target/arm/cpu.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
> index b0d032c..e544f1d 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu.c
> +++ b/targ
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lindsay
---
target/arm/cpu.c | 3 +++
target/arm/cpu.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
index b0d032c..e544f1d 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
@@ -765,6 +765,7 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(Devic
12 matches
Mail list logo
