On 1/17/19 2:07 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 17.01.2019 6:21, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 1/16/19 9:43 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>
@@ -839,9 +842,25 @@ static int nbd_list_meta_contexts(QIOChannel *ioc,
ret = nbd_receive_one_meta_context(ioc,
17.01.2019 6:21, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 1/16/19 9:43 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>
>>> @@ -839,9 +842,25 @@ static int nbd_list_meta_contexts(QIOChannel *ioc,
>>>
>>>ret = nbd_receive_one_meta_context(ioc,
>>> NBD_OPT_LIST_META_CONTEXT,
>>>
On 1/16/19 9:43 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> @@ -839,9 +842,25 @@ static int nbd_list_meta_contexts(QIOChannel *ioc,
>>
>> ret = nbd_receive_one_meta_context(ioc, NBD_OPT_LIST_META_CONTEXT,
>> &context, NULL, errp);
>> +i
12.01.2019 20:58, Eric Blake wrote:
> Commit 3d068aff forgot to advertise available qemu: contexts
> when the client requests a list with 0 queries. Furthermore,
> 3.0 shipped with a qemu-img hack of x-dirty-bitmap (commit
> 216ee365) that _silently_ acts as though the entire image is
> clean if a
Commit 3d068aff forgot to advertise available qemu: contexts
when the client requests a list with 0 queries. Furthermore,
3.0 shipped with a qemu-img hack of x-dirty-bitmap (commit
216ee365) that _silently_ acts as though the entire image is
clean if a requested bitmap is not present. Both bugs ha
