On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:42:15AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 20:39:03 +0100
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 10:53:43AM +, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > Replace AML template patching with direct composing
> > > of PCI device entries in C. It all
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 20:39:03 +0100
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 10:53:43AM +, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > Replace AML template patching with direct composing
> > of PCI device entries in C. It allows to simplify
> > PCI tree generation further and saves us about 400LOC
>
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 20:39:03 +0100
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 10:53:43AM +, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > Replace AML template patching with direct composing
> > of PCI device entries in C. It allows to simplify
> > PCI tree generation further and saves us about 400LOC
>
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 10:53:43AM +, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> Replace AML template patching with direct composing
> of PCI device entries in C. It allows to simplify
> PCI tree generation further and saves us about 400LOC
> scattered through different files, confining tree
> generation to one C
Replace AML template patching with direct composing
of PCI device entries in C. It allows to simplify
PCI tree generation further and saves us about 400LOC
scattered through different files, confining tree
generation to one C function which is much easier
to deal with.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov
