On 17 Jun 2014, at 08:12, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 05:06:15PM -0500, Greg Bellows wrote:
>> I just wanted to point out that the change from array-notation to hard-code
>> numbers in the names undoes Edgar's EL2/EL3 changes. I prefer this way
>> over the array notation.
I agree, if we are going to allow for EL-based array indexing then the
indices should correspond to the actual EL for clarity.
I am fine with the above compromise.
On 17 June 2014 01:12, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 05:06:15PM -0500, Greg Bellows wrote:
> > I just wanted
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 05:06:15PM -0500, Greg Bellows wrote:
> I just wanted to point out that the change from array-notation to hard-code
> numbers in the names undoes Edgar's EL2/EL3 changes. I prefer this way
> over the array notation.
Hi,
This was discussed briefly here
http://lists.gnu.org
I just wanted to point out that the change from array-notation to hard-code
numbers in the names undoes Edgar's EL2/EL3 changes. I prefer this way
over the array notation.
On 10 June 2014 18:55, Fabian Aggeler wrote:
> When EL3 is running in Aarch32 (or ARMv7 with Security Extensions)
> DFSR h
When EL3 is running in Aarch32 (or ARMv7 with Security Extensions)
DFSR has a secure and a non-secure instance.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Aggeler
---
target-arm/cpu.h| 13 -
target-arm/helper-a64.c | 17 ++---
target-arm/helper.c | 15 ---
3 files chan
