On 02.06.2017 16:34, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 02.06.2017 16:04, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> [...]
>> I understand your point. That said I doubt we will support the SIE
>> instruction soon (it looks quite complicated and I can't find any doc).
>
> There is unfortunately no public documentation for the S
On 02.06.2017 16:04, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[...]
> I understand your point. That said I doubt we will support the SIE
> instruction soon (it looks quite complicated and I can't find any doc).
There is unfortunately no public documentation for the SIE instruction.
The only spec that is available is
On 02.06.2017 16:04, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2017-06-02 13:30, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 02.06.2017 10:09, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 01.06.2017 21:17, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On 2017-06-01 11:04, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 01.06.2017 10:38, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 01.06
On 2017-06-02 13:30, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 02.06.2017 10:09, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > On 01.06.2017 21:17, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >> On 2017-06-01 11:04, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >>> On 01.06.2017 10:38, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 01.06.2017 00:01, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > At
On 2017-06-01 21:56, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 01.06.2017 21:17, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2017-06-01 10:38, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> On 01.06.2017 00:01, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >>> At the same time fix the TCG version of get_max_cpu_model to return the
> >>> maximum model like on KVM.
On 02.06.2017 10:09, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 01.06.2017 21:17, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> On 2017-06-01 11:04, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 01.06.2017 10:38, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 01.06.2017 00:01, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> At the same time fix the TCG version of get_max_cpu_model to
On 01.06.2017 21:17, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2017-06-01 11:04, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 01.06.2017 10:38, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 01.06.2017 00:01, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
At the same time fix the TCG version of get_max_cpu_model to return the
maximum model like on KVM. Rem
On 01.06.2017 21:17, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2017-06-01 10:38, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 01.06.2017 00:01, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>> At the same time fix the TCG version of get_max_cpu_model to return the
>>> maximum model like on KVM. Remove the ETF2 and long-displacement
>>
>> I don't und
On 2017-06-01 11:04, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 01.06.2017 10:38, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 01.06.2017 00:01, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >> At the same time fix the TCG version of get_max_cpu_model to return the
> >> maximum model like on KVM. Remove the ETF2 and long-displacement
> >
> > I
On 2017-06-01 10:38, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 01.06.2017 00:01, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > At the same time fix the TCG version of get_max_cpu_model to return the
> > maximum model like on KVM. Remove the ETF2 and long-displacement
>
> I don't understand the part
> "fix the TCG version of get_
On 01.06.2017 10:38, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 01.06.2017 00:01, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> At the same time fix the TCG version of get_max_cpu_model to return the
>> maximum model like on KVM. Remove the ETF2 and long-displacement
>
> I don't understand the part
> "fix the TCG version of get_ma
On 01.06.2017 00:01, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> At the same time fix the TCG version of get_max_cpu_model to return the
> maximum model like on KVM. Remove the ETF2 and long-displacement
I don't understand the part
"fix the TCG version of get_max_cpu_model to return the maximum model
like on KVM".
C
At the same time fix the TCG version of get_max_cpu_model to return the
maximum model like on KVM. Remove the ETF2 and long-displacement
facilities from the additional features as it is included in the z800.
Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno
---
target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 13 ++---
1 file c
13 matches
Mail list logo
