On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 06:31:32PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2015-10-02 13:24, James Hogan wrote:
> > Extend MIPS movcond implementation to support the SELNEZ/SELEQZ
> > instructions introduced in MIPS r6 (where MOVN/MOVZ have been removed).
> >
> > Whereas the "MOVN/MOVZ rd, rs, rt" instr
On 2015-10-02 13:24, James Hogan wrote:
> Extend MIPS movcond implementation to support the SELNEZ/SELEQZ
> instructions introduced in MIPS r6 (where MOVN/MOVZ have been removed).
>
> Whereas the "MOVN/MOVZ rd, rs, rt" instructions have the following
> semantics:
> rd = [!]rt ? rs : rd
>
> The "
On 2015-10-07 12:47, Leon Alrae wrote:
> On 07/10/15 10:46, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > Leon, do you want to take this as a mips maintainer, or shall I as tcg
> > maintainer?
>
> I thought this would go via Aurelien's mips tcg-backend queue. But if
> Aurelien is busy, could you take them? (at the
On 10/07/2015 09:34 PM, James Hogan wrote:
{ INDEX_op_brcond_i32, { "rZ", "rZ" } },
+#if !use_mips32r6_instructions
{ INDEX_op_movcond_i32, { "r", "rZ", "rZ", "rZ", "0" } },
+#else
+{ INDEX_op_movcond_i32, { "r", "rZ", "rZ", "rZ", "rZ" } },
+#endif
The only thing I'd change is
On 07/10/15 10:46, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Leon, do you want to take this as a mips maintainer, or shall I as tcg
> maintainer?
I thought this would go via Aurelien's mips tcg-backend queue. But if
Aurelien is busy, could you take them? (at the moment I don't have
anything handy to test the mip
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 08:46:30PM +1100, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/02/2015 10:24 PM, James Hogan wrote:
> > Extend MIPS movcond implementation to support the SELNEZ/SELEQZ
> > instructions introduced in MIPS r6 (where MOVN/MOVZ have been removed).
> >
> > Whereas the "MOVN/MOVZ rd, rs, rt"
On 10/02/2015 10:24 PM, James Hogan wrote:
Extend MIPS movcond implementation to support the SELNEZ/SELEQZ
instructions introduced in MIPS r6 (where MOVN/MOVZ have been removed).
Whereas the "MOVN/MOVZ rd, rs, rt" instructions have the following
semantics:
rd = [!]rt ? rs : rd
The "SELNEZ/SEL
Extend MIPS movcond implementation to support the SELNEZ/SELEQZ
instructions introduced in MIPS r6 (where MOVN/MOVZ have been removed).
Whereas the "MOVN/MOVZ rd, rs, rt" instructions have the following
semantics:
rd = [!]rt ? rs : rd
The "SELNEZ/SELEQZ rd, rs, rt" instructions are slightly diff
