On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 07:45:10PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 01.05.2015 um 12:30 schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
>
> Looks good in general. Some minor nits below, and one limitation
> possibly worth mentioning in the second paragraph of the commit message:
> It assumes a 1:1 mapping. I do gues
Am 01.05.2015 um 12:30 schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> A QOM property can be parsed as enum using the visit_type_enum()
> helper method, but this forces callers to use the more complex
> generic object_property_add() method when registering it. It
> also requires that users of that object have access
A QOM property can be parsed as enum using the visit_type_enum()
helper method, but this forces callers to use the more complex
generic object_property_add() method when registering it. It
also requires that users of that object have access to the
string map when they want to read the property valu
