Thanks, applied.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-09-29 18:11, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 09/29/2011 08:23 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> +#ifndef TCG_TARGET_deposit_i32_valid
>>> +#define TCG_TARGET_deposit_i32_valid(ofs, len) 0
>>> +#endif
>>> +#ifndef TCG_TARGET_depo
On 09/29/2011 09:52 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> x86 cannot provide an optimized generic deposit implementation. But at
> least for a few special cases, namely for writing bits 0..7, 8..15, and
> 0..15, versions using only a single instruction are feasible.
> Introducing such limited support improves em
On 2011-09-29 18:11, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 09/29/2011 08:23 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> +#ifndef TCG_TARGET_deposit_i32_valid
>> +#define TCG_TARGET_deposit_i32_valid(ofs, len) 0
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef TCG_TARGET_deposit_i64_valid
>> +#define TCG_TARGET_deposit_i64_valid(ofs, len) 0
>> +#endif
