Emilio G. Cota writes:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 11:17:03 +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Emilio G. Cota writes:
>> > Would be great to get this in for 3.1.
>>
>> I would like this merged by 3.1 as well. However I think there is still
>> some work to be done on the testing side. IIRC the fptest c
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 11:17:03 +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Emilio G. Cota writes:
> > Would be great to get this in for 3.1.
>
> I would like this merged by 3.1 as well. However I think there is still
> some work to be done on the testing side. IIRC the fptest case works
> with whitelists and I
Emilio G. Cota writes:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 21:48:46 -0400, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
>> Sending this respin (little more than a rebase) in case there's
>> reviewer bandwidth available until the soft-freeze in 3 weeks.
>
> *ping*
>
> Would be great to get this in for 3.1.
I would like this me
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 21:48:46 -0400, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
> Sending this respin (little more than a rebase) in case there's
> reviewer bandwidth available until the soft-freeze in 3 weeks.
*ping*
Would be great to get this in for 3.1.
BTW I have a paper under submission that covers this work
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Type: series
Message-id: 1528768140-17894-1-git-send-email-c...@braap.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/14] fp-test + hardfloat
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash
BASE=base
n=1
total=$(git
Sending this respin (little more than a rebase) in case there's
reviewer bandwidth available until the soft-freeze in 3 weeks.
v3: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-04/msg00455.html
Not much has changed since April's v3:
- Rebase to current master, fixing some conflicts.
- Ad
