On 11/30/2017 07:04 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Most of conversions looks fine, but it is not simple to prove the
correctness, because we start to use internal driver logic on offsets
and lengths, not aligned to sectors.
The block layer guarantees that it will not pass unaligned dat
Most of conversions looks fine, but it is not simple to prove the
correctness, because we start to use internal driver logic on offsets
and lengths, not aligned to sectors. And we can't imagine the
consequences (at least, I can't and my r-b doesn't give the guarantee)
of such change. It is like ta
On 11/21/2017 05:27 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is it a latest portion of moving to byte-based? All other parts are
> already merged? Are you going to update it? (or this version if ok for
> review?)
This version is okay to review; although it will need a v5 respin once
2.12
Hi!
Is it a latest portion of moving to byte-based? All other parts are
already merged? Are you going to update it? (or this version if ok for
review?)
12.10.2017 21:58, Eric Blake wrote:
There are patches floating around to add NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS,
but NBD wants to report status on byte gr
There are patches floating around to add NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS,
but NBD wants to report status on byte granularity (even if the
reporting will probably be naturally aligned to sectors or even
much higher levels). I've therefore started the task of
converting our block status code to report at a byt
