Hi,
This series:
- split the byte-based definitions from "qemu/cutils.h" to "qemu/units.h"
(this now triggers WARNING: 1 added file, does MAINTAINERS need updating?)
- clean hw/ includes;
- replace different constants used for byte size with their corresponding
IEC binary prefix definitions.
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 10:14:21PM -0300, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This series:
>
> - split the byte-based definitions from "qemu/cutils.h" to "qemu/units.h"
> (this now triggers WARNING: 1 added file, does MAINTAINERS need updating?)
> - clean hw/ includes;
> - replace different
On 06/10/2018 08:14 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi,
This series:
- split the byte-based definitions from "qemu/cutils.h" to "qemu/units.h"
(this now triggers WARNING: 1 added file, does MAINTAINERS need updating?)
- clean hw/ includes;
- replace different constants used for byte size w
On 11 June 2018 at 16:55, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 06/10/2018 08:14 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This series:
>>
>> - split the byte-based definitions from "qemu/cutils.h" to "qemu/units.h"
>>(this now triggers WARNING: 1 added file, does MAINTAINERS need
>> updating?)
>> -
On Sun, 10 Jun 2018 22:14:21 -0300
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This series:
>
> - split the byte-based definitions from "qemu/cutils.h" to "qemu/units.h"
> (this now triggers WARNING: 1 added file, does MAINTAINERS need updating?)
> - clean hw/ includes;
> - replace different cons
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 10:55:17AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 06/10/2018 08:14 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This series:
> >
> > - split the byte-based definitions from "qemu/cutils.h" to "qemu/units.h"
> >(this now triggers WARNING: 1 added file, does MAINTAINERS need
