Eric Blake writes:
> On 03/08/2016 09:23 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Eric Blake writes:
>>
>>> Rather than requiring all flat unions to explicitly create
>>> a separate base struct, we can allow the qapi schema to specify
>>> the common members via an inline dictionary. This is similar to
>
On 03/08/2016 09:23 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> Rather than requiring all flat unions to explicitly create
>> a separate base struct, we can allow the qapi schema to specify
>> the common members via an inline dictionary. This is similar to
>> how commands can specify a
Eric Blake writes:
> Rather than requiring all flat unions to explicitly create
> a separate base struct, we can allow the qapi schema to specify
> the common members via an inline dictionary. This is similar to
> how commands can specify an inline anonymous type for its 'data'.
> We already have
Rather than requiring all flat unions to explicitly create
a separate base struct, we can allow the qapi schema to specify
the common members via an inline dictionary. This is similar to
how commands can specify an inline anonymous type for its 'data'.
We already have several struct types that only
