On Thu 14 Jul 2016 03:28:11 PM CEST, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the
> external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts
> drive-backup and the corresponding transaction action to accept a
> node-name without lifting the restri
On 14.07.2016 15:28, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the
> external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts
> drive-backup and the corresponding transaction action to accept a
> node-name without lifting the restriction that we're
On 07/14/2016 07:28 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the
> external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts
> drive-backup and the corresponding transaction action to accept a
> node-name without lifting the restriction that we
In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the
external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts
drive-backup and the corresponding transaction action to accept a
node-name without lifting the restriction that we're operating at a root
node.
In case of an inval
