On 02.08.2016 18:19, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 18.07.2016 um 16:30 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> On 14.07.2016 15:28, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the
>>> external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts
>>> drive-mirror to
Am 18.07.2016 um 16:30 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 14.07.2016 15:28, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the
> > external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts
> > drive-mirror to accept a node-name without lifting the
On 14.07.2016 15:28, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the
> external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts
> drive-mirror to accept a node-name without lifting the restriction that
> we're operating at a root node.
>
> In case
On 07/14/2016 07:28 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the
> external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts
> drive-mirror to accept a node-name without lifting the restriction that
> we're operating at a root node.
>
> In
In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the
external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts
drive-mirror to accept a node-name without lifting the restriction that
we're operating at a root node.
In case of an invalid device name, the command returns the
