On 5/10/2017 9:48 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/10/2017 10:27 AM, Pradeep Jagadeesh wrote:
Isn't it a bit overkill to introduce a new file for a single function ?
Maybe you could simply move this to util/throttle.c ?
OK, but I will add one more function later patch. Still do you think
better
On 05/10/2017 10:27 AM, Pradeep Jagadeesh wrote:
>>
>> Isn't it a bit overkill to introduce a new file for a single function ?
>> Maybe you could simply move this to util/throttle.c ?
>>
> OK, but I will add one more function later patch. Still do you think
> better to move to util/thottle.c?
As
On 5/10/2017 4:12 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Wed, 10 May 2017 04:41:20 -0400
Pradeep Jagadeesh wrote:
This patch factor out the duplicate throttle code that was present in
block and fsdev devices.
Signed-off-by: Pradeep Jagadeesh
---
On Wed, 10 May 2017 04:41:20 -0400
Pradeep Jagadeesh wrote:
> This patch factor out the duplicate throttle code that was present in
> block and fsdev devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pradeep Jagadeesh
> ---
> blockdev.c
This patch factor out the duplicate throttle code that was present in
block and fsdev devices.
Signed-off-by: Pradeep Jagadeesh
---
blockdev.c | 44 +--
fsdev/qemu-fsdev-throttle.c | 43