On Mon, 06/05 15:38, Eric Blake wrote:
> The lone caller that cares about a return of BDRV_BLOCK_RAW
> (namely, io.c:bdrv_co_get_block_status) completely replaces the
> return value, so there is no point in passing BDRV_BLOCK_DATA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
>
> ---
> v3: further document BDR
The lone caller that cares about a return of BDRV_BLOCK_RAW
(namely, io.c:bdrv_co_get_block_status) completely replaces the
return value, so there is no point in passing BDRV_BLOCK_DATA.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
---
v3: further document BDRV_BLOCK_RAW
v2: fix subject, tweak commit message
---
