On Fri 18 Sep 2015 04:49:06 PM CEST, Eric Blake wrote:
>> +# @BlockdevSnapshot
>> +#
>> +# @device: device or node name to generate the snapshot from.
>
> I'm still wondering if 'node' is a better name than 'device' here.
I don't have a strong preference. Kevin, Max, ... any
Am 22.09.2015 um 11:21 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben:
> On Fri 18 Sep 2015 04:49:06 PM CEST, Eric Blake wrote:
>
> >> +# @BlockdevSnapshot
> >> +#
> >> +# @device: device or node name to generate the snapshot from.
> >
> > I'm still wondering if 'node' is a better name than
On 14.09.2015 18:01, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> One of the limitations of the 'blockdev-snapshot-sync' command is that
> it does not allow passing BlockdevOptions to the newly created
> snapshots, so they are always opened using the default values.
>
> Extending the command to allow passing options
On 09/14/2015 10:01 AM, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> One of the limitations of the 'blockdev-snapshot-sync' command is that
> it does not allow passing BlockdevOptions to the newly created
> snapshots, so they are always opened using the default values.
>
> Extending the command to allow passing
One of the limitations of the 'blockdev-snapshot-sync' command is that
it does not allow passing BlockdevOptions to the newly created
snapshots, so they are always opened using the default values.
Extending the command to allow passing options is not a practical
solution because there is overlap