On 05/15/2018 02:29 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
git-am isn't happy on current master. The conflicts look simple enough
for a maintainer to resolve, but that's yet another hurdle. Best to
respin, I think (assuming you still want the patches to go in).
Just respinned it to v6. Let's see how
Daniel Henrique Barboza writes:
> On 05/14/2018 05:46 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Markus Armbruster writes:
>>
>>> Daniel Henrique Barboza writes:
>>>
Ping
>>> Michael, you reviewed v4 (at least in part), can you
On 05/14/2018 05:46 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Markus Armbruster writes:
Daniel Henrique Barboza writes:
Ping
Michael, you reviewed v4 (at least in part), can you have a look?
Have these patches fallen through the cracks?
Should I
Markus Armbruster writes:
> Daniel Henrique Barboza writes:
>
>> Ping
>
> Michael, you reviewed v4 (at least in part), can you have a look?
Have these patches fallen through the cracks?
Daniel Henrique Barboza writes:
> Ping
Michael, you reviewed v4 (at least in part), can you have a look?
Ping
On 02/19/2018 11:12 AM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
v5:
- removed a paragraph in the recently added qemu_register_wakeup_notifier
comment that was added. That paragraph was adding too much in-depth
information about the current design of the system_wakeup, making it
harder to understand
v5:
- removed a paragraph in the recently added qemu_register_wakeup_notifier
comment that was added. That paragraph was adding too much in-depth
information about the current design of the system_wakeup, making it
harder to understand the whole point (suggested by Mike Roth).
- previous version