Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/3] virtio-scsi: restart DMA after iothread

2019-06-27 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 20.06.2019 um 19:37 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben: > v5: > * Plumbing vm change state handlers into DeviceClass/BusClass is a rather >large bug fix. Instead I've combined the previous priorities approach with >the observation from Kevin and Paolo that we really want to order by qdev

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/3] virtio-scsi: restart DMA after iothread

2019-06-20 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 20/06/19 19:37, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > v5: > * Plumbing vm change state handlers into DeviceClass/BusClass is a rather >large bug fix. Instead I've combined the previous priorities approach with >the observation from Kevin and Paolo that we really want to order by qdev >tree dept

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/3] virtio-scsi: restart DMA after iothread

2019-06-20 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
v5: * Plumbing vm change state handlers into DeviceClass/BusClass is a rather large bug fix. Instead I've combined the previous priorities approach with the observation from Kevin and Paolo that we really want to order by qdev tree depth. The new qdev_add_vm_change_state_handler() AP

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/3] virtio-scsi: restart DMA after iothread

2019-06-20 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
v5: * Plumbing vm change state handlers into DeviceClass/BusClass is a rather large bug fix. Instead I've combined the previous priorities approach with the observation from Kevin and Paolo that we really want to order by qdev tree depth. The new qdev_add_vm_change_state_handler() AP