On 9/4/19 3:48 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 00:54, Richard Henderson
> wrote:
>> However, while working on this patch set, I noticed that we have a lot of
>> unnecessary overlap between A- and M- profile in the TBFLAGs. Thus point 4
>> above and the completely separate rebuil
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 00:54, Richard Henderson
wrote:
> However, while working on this patch set, I noticed that we have a lot of
> unnecessary overlap between A- and M- profile in the TBFLAGs. Thus point 4
> above and the completely separate rebuild_hflags_m32().
>
> If we rearrange things like
On 8/20/19 2:07 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Changes since v4:
> * Split patch 1 into 15 smaller patches.
> * Cache the new DEBUG_TARGET_EL field.
> * Split out m-profile hflags separately from a-profile 32-bit.
> * Move around non-cached tb flags as well, avoiding repetitive
> checks
Changes since v4:
* Split patch 1 into 15 smaller patches.
* Cache the new DEBUG_TARGET_EL field.
* Split out m-profile hflags separately from a-profile 32-bit.
* Move around non-cached tb flags as well, avoiding repetitive
checks for m-profile or other mutually exclusive conditions.
