Subject suggests you're just polishing error messages here. In fact,
you're fixing the generator to detect errors. Suggest something like
qapi: Tighten checking of unions
Eric Blake writes:
> Previous commits demonstrated that the generator had several
> flaws with less-than-perfect union
On 03/24/2015 02:03 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Previous commits demonstrated that the generator had several
> flaws with less-than-perfect unions:
> - make the use of a base without discriminator a hard error,
> since the previous patch removed all remaining uses of it
> - a simple union that listed t
Previous commits demonstrated that the generator had several
flaws with less-than-perfect unions:
- make the use of a base without discriminator a hard error,
since the previous patch removed all remaining uses of it
- a simple union that listed the same branch twice (or two variant
names that map
