Eric Blake writes:
> On 09/28/2015 06:43 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Eric Blake writes:
>>
>>> A future patch will enable error reporting from the various
>>> check() methods. But to report an error on an implicit type,
>>> we'll need to associate a
On 09/28/2015 06:43 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> A future patch will enable error reporting from the various
>> check() methods. But to report an error on an implicit type,
>> we'll need to associate a location with the type (the same
>> location as
Eric Blake writes:
> A future patch will enable error reporting from the various
> check() methods. But to report an error on an implicit type,
> we'll need to associate a location with the type (the same
> location as the top-level entity that is causing the creation
> of
A future patch will enable error reporting from the various
check() methods. But to report an error on an implicit type,
we'll need to associate a location with the type (the same
location as the top-level entity that is causing the creation
of the implicit type), and once we do that, keying off