21.06.2019 16:39, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 13.06.2019 1:09, Max Reitz wrote:
>> With bdrv_filtered_rw_bs(), we can easily handle this default filter
>> behavior in bdrv_co_block_status().
>>
>> blkdebug wants to have an additional assertion, so it keeps its own
>> implementation, excep
13.06.2019 1:09, Max Reitz wrote:
> With bdrv_filtered_rw_bs(), we can easily handle this default filter
> behavior in bdrv_co_block_status().
>
> blkdebug wants to have an additional assertion, so it keeps its own
> implementation, except bdrv_co_block_status_from_file() needs to be
> inlined the
On 19.06.19 11:34, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 13.06.2019 1:09, Max Reitz wrote:
>> With bdrv_filtered_rw_bs(), we can easily handle this default filter
>> behavior in bdrv_co_block_status().
>>
>> blkdebug wants to have an additional assertion, so it keeps its own
>> implementation, exce
On 19.06.19 11:34, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 13.06.2019 1:09, Max Reitz wrote:
>> With bdrv_filtered_rw_bs(), we can easily handle this default filter
>> behavior in bdrv_co_block_status().
>>
>> blkdebug wants to have an additional assertion, so it keeps its own
>> implementation, exce
13.06.2019 1:09, Max Reitz wrote:
> With bdrv_filtered_rw_bs(), we can easily handle this default filter
> behavior in bdrv_co_block_status().
>
> blkdebug wants to have an additional assertion, so it keeps its own
> implementation, except bdrv_co_block_status_from_file() needs to be
> inlined the
With bdrv_filtered_rw_bs(), we can easily handle this default filter
behavior in bdrv_co_block_status().
blkdebug wants to have an additional assertion, so it keeps its own
implementation, except bdrv_co_block_status_from_file() needs to be
inlined there.
Suggested-by: Eric Blake
Signed-off-by:
