On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:32:06AM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Stupid question: The subject says "SMP command". Did you mean "QMP
> command" ?
It's for sure a good question... My fault. It should be QMP.
Thanks to point out.
-- peterx
Hi Peter,
Stupid question: The subject says "SMP command". Did you mean "QMP
command" ?
Thanks,
-Christoffer
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 01:32:29PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> v6 changes:
> - patch 1 (squashed into patch 2)
> - explain more about the following in commit message: why we need
> th
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 09:54:03AM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 13:32 +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > v6 changes:
> > - patch 1 (squashed into patch 2)
> > - explain more about the following in commit message: why we need
> > this command, and what does the entries mean [
On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 13:32 +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> v6 changes:
> - patch 1 (squashed into patch 2)
> - explain more about the following in commit message: why we need
> this command, and what does the entries mean [Markus]
> - explain what GIC is [Eric]
> - squash this patch into patch
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 01:32:29PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> The new command can report which kind of GIC device the host/QEMU
> support. The returned result is in the form of array.
>
> Sample command and output:
>
> {"execute": "query-gic-capability"}
> {"return": [{"emulated": false, "version":
v6 changes:
- patch 1 (squashed into patch 2)
- explain more about the following in commit message: why we need
this command, and what does the entries mean [Markus]
- explain what GIC is [Eric]
- squash this patch into patch 2 [Eric]
- patch 2 (new patch 1)
- fix "does not implement" e
