On 04/09/2015 04:28 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 09:16:21 +0800
Zhu Guihua zhugh.f...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
On 04/08/2015 06:47 PM, Paulo Ricardo Paz Vital wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 11:52 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 05:49:42PM +0800, Zhu Guihua
On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 09:16:21 +0800
Zhu Guihua zhugh.f...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
On 04/08/2015 06:47 PM, Paulo Ricardo Paz Vital wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 11:52 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 05:49:42PM +0800, Zhu Guihua wrote:
Ping...
It's only been 4 days.
On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 11:52 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 05:49:42PM +0800, Zhu Guihua wrote:
Ping...
It's only been 4 days. We are finalizing 2.3 so pls sit tight.
I agree with Michael, it's time to close 2.3.
But I have a question. Is the patch counter
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 05:49:42PM +0800, Zhu Guihua wrote:
Ping...
It's only been 4 days. We are finalizing 2.3 so pls sit tight.
On 04/02/2015 05:50 PM, Zhu Guihua wrote:
This patchset adds support to hot unplug memory.
Memory hot unplug is complicated multi-stage process. Unplug
Ping...
On 04/02/2015 05:50 PM, Zhu Guihua wrote:
This patchset adds support to hot unplug memory.
Memory hot unplug is complicated multi-stage process. Unplug request callback
sends remove request. After guest os processes ejection request, OSPM will
execute _EJ0 to signal qemu that a device
On 04/08/2015 06:47 PM, Paulo Ricardo Paz Vital wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 11:52 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 05:49:42PM +0800, Zhu Guihua wrote:
Ping...
It's only been 4 days. We are finalizing 2.3 so pls sit tight.
I agree with Michael, it's time to close
This patchset adds support to hot unplug memory.
Memory hot unplug is complicated multi-stage process. Unplug request callback
sends remove request. After guest os processes ejection request, OSPM will
execute _EJ0 to signal qemu that a device eject will be to occur. Then qemu
will call unplug
