On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 10:42:26AM +0800, Wenchao Xia wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 02:43:44PM +0800, Wenchao Xia wrote:
Reviewed-by: Wenchao Xia xiaw...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
One question: old code missed itself in bdrv_drain_all(), is that a bug?
Sorry, I don't understand the question.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 05:18:08PM +0200, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
In bdrv_delete() make sure to call bdrv_make_anon() *after* bdrv_close()
so that the device is still seen by bdrv_drain_all() when iterating
bdrv_states.
Cc: qemu-sta...@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 02:43:44PM +0800, Wenchao Xia wrote:
Reviewed-by: Wenchao Xia xiaw...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
One question: old code missed itself in bdrv_drain_all(), is that a bug?
Sorry, I don't understand the question. Can you rephrase it?
In bdrv_delete() make sure to call
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 02:43:44PM +0800, Wenchao Xia wrote:
Reviewed-by: Wenchao Xia xiaw...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
One question: old code missed itself in bdrv_drain_all(), is that a bug?
Sorry, I don't understand the question. Can you rephrase it?
Before this patch, in the code path:
Reviewed-by: Wenchao Xia xiaw...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
One question: old code missed itself in bdrv_drain_all(), is that a bug?
In bdrv_delete() make sure to call bdrv_make_anon() *after* bdrv_close()
so that the device is still seen by bdrv_drain_all() when iterating
bdrv_states.
Cc:
In bdrv_delete() make sure to call bdrv_make_anon() *after* bdrv_close()
so that the device is still seen by bdrv_drain_all() when iterating
bdrv_states.
Cc: qemu-sta...@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@redhat.com
---
block.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2
