Referring to "type" as both a meta-type (built-in, enum, union,
alternte, or struct) and a specific type (the name that the
schema uses for declaring structs) is confusing. The confusion
is only made worse by the fact that the generator mostly already
refers to struct even when dealing with expr['
Eric Blake writes:
> Referring to "type" as both a meta-type (built-in, enum, union,
> alternte, or struct) and a specific type (the name that the
> schema uses for declaring structs) is confusing. The confusion
> is only made worse by the fact that the generator mostly already
> refers to struc
