On 09/10/2018 08:12 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 04:11:34PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> The new layout using static IRQ number does not leave much space to
>> the dynamic MSI range, only 0x100 IRQ numbers. Increase the total
>> number of IRQS for newer machines and introd
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 04:11:34PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> The new layout using static IRQ number does not leave much space to
> the dynamic MSI range, only 0x100 IRQ numbers. Increase the total
> number of IRQS for newer machines and introduce a legacy XICS backend
> for pre-3.1 machines
On 08/02/2018 04:47 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 16:11:34 +0200
> Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>
>> The new layout using static IRQ number does not leave much space to
>> the dynamic MSI range, only 0x100 IRQ numbers. Increase the total
>> number of IRQS for newer machines and introduce
On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 16:11:34 +0200
Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> The new layout using static IRQ number does not leave much space to
> the dynamic MSI range, only 0x100 IRQ numbers. Increase the total
> number of IRQS for newer machines and introduce a legacy XICS backend
> for pre-3.1 machines to ma
The new layout using static IRQ number does not leave much space to
the dynamic MSI range, only 0x100 IRQ numbers. Increase the total
number of IRQS for newer machines and introduce a legacy XICS backend
for pre-3.1 machines to maintain compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater
---
include/
