On 23.10.2013, at 07:57, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Am 27.09.2013 09:05, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
IBM POWERPC processors encode PVR as a CPU family in higher 16 bits and
a CPU version in lower 16 bits. Since there is no significant change
in behavior between versions, there
Am 27.09.2013 09:05, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
IBM POWERPC processors encode PVR as a CPU family in higher 16 bits and
a CPU version in lower 16 bits. Since there is no significant change
in behavior between versions, there is no point to add every single CPU
version in QEMU's CPU list.
On 10/14/2013 02:04 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 09/30/2013 09:30 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.09.2013, at 10:05, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
IBM POWERPC processors encode PVR as a CPU family in higher 16 bits and
a CPU version in lower 16 bits. Since there is no significant change
On 09/30/2013 09:30 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.09.2013, at 10:05, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
IBM POWERPC processors encode PVR as a CPU family in higher 16 bits and
a CPU version in lower 16 bits. Since there is no significant change
in behavior between versions, there is no point to
On 27.09.2013, at 10:05, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
IBM POWERPC processors encode PVR as a CPU family in higher 16 bits and
a CPU version in lower 16 bits. Since there is no significant change
in behavior between versions, there is no point to add every single CPU
version in QEMU's CPU
IBM POWERPC processors encode PVR as a CPU family in higher 16 bits and
a CPU version in lower 16 bits. Since there is no significant change
in behavior between versions, there is no point to add every single CPU
version in QEMU's CPU list. Also, new CPU versions of already supported
CPU won't
