Am 04.03.2013 12:50, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 4 March 2013 19:10, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 26.02.2013 18:40, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>
>>> if (s->num_cpu > NCPU) {
>>> -hw_error("requested %u CPUs exceeds GIC maximum %d\n",
>>> - s->num_cpu, NCPU);
>>> +e
On 4 March 2013 19:10, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 26.02.2013 18:40, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> if (s->num_cpu > NCPU) {
>> -hw_error("requested %u CPUs exceeds GIC maximum %d\n",
>> - s->num_cpu, NCPU);
>> +error_setg(errp, "requested %u CPUs exceeds GIC maximu
Am 26.02.2013 18:40, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> Convert the ARM GIC classes to use init/realize rather than
> SysBusDevice::init. (We have to do them all in one patch to
> avoid unconverted subclasses calling a nonexistent SysBusDevice
> init function in the base class and crashing.)
>
> Signed-off-
Convert the ARM GIC classes to use init/realize rather than
SysBusDevice::init. (We have to do them all in one patch to
avoid unconverted subclasses calling a nonexistent SysBusDevice
init function in the base class and crashing.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell
---
hw/arm_gic.c | 23 +++