On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Harsh Bora wrote:
> On 07/18/2012 12:31 AM, Harsh Bora wrote:
>>
>> On 07/17/2012 08:51 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Harsh Prateek Bora
>>> wrote:
@@ -75,16 +96,31 @@ static char *trace_file_name = NULL;
*
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Harsh Bora wrote:
> On 07/17/2012 08:51 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Harsh Prateek Bora
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Existing simpletrace backend allows to trace at max 6 args and does not
>>> support strings. This newer tracelog format g
On 07/18/2012 12:31 AM, Harsh Bora wrote:
On 07/17/2012 08:51 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Harsh Prateek Bora
wrote:
Existing simpletrace backend allows to trace at max 6 args and does not
support strings. This newer tracelog format gets rid of fixed size
records
On 07/17/2012 08:51 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Harsh Prateek Bora
wrote:
Existing simpletrace backend allows to trace at max 6 args and does not
support strings. This newer tracelog format gets rid of fixed size records
and therefore allows to trace variable num
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Harsh Prateek Bora
wrote:
> Existing simpletrace backend allows to trace at max 6 args and does not
> support strings. This newer tracelog format gets rid of fixed size records
> and therefore allows to trace variable number of args including strings.
>
> Sample tr
Existing simpletrace backend allows to trace at max 6 args and does not
support strings. This newer tracelog format gets rid of fixed size records
and therefore allows to trace variable number of args including strings.
Sample trace with strings:
v9fs_version 0.000 tag=0x id=0x64 msize=0x2000
