On (Fri) 31 Jul 2015 [10:50:46], Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Amit Shah (amit.s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > On (Tue) 16 Jun 2015 [11:26:48], Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> > > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
> > >
> > > Once we're in postcopy the source processors are stopped and memory
* Amit Shah (amit.s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On (Tue) 16 Jun 2015 [11:26:48], Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
> >
> > Once we're in postcopy the source processors are stopped and memory
> > shouldn't change any more, so there's no need to look at the dirty
>
On (Tue) 16 Jun 2015 [11:26:48], Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
>
> Once we're in postcopy the source processors are stopped and memory
> shouldn't change any more, so there's no need to look at the dirty
> map.
>
> There are two notes to this:
> 1) If we
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
> "Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)" wrote:
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
> >
> > Once we're in postcopy the source processors are stopped and memory
> > shouldn't change any more, so there's no need to look at the dirty
> > map.
> >
> > There are two
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)" wrote:
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
>
> Once we're in postcopy the source processors are stopped and memory
> shouldn't change any more, so there's no need to look at the dirty
> map.
>
> There are two notes to this:
> 1) If we do resync and a page had changed
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
Once we're in postcopy the source processors are stopped and memory
shouldn't change any more, so there's no need to look at the dirty
map.
There are two notes to this:
1) If we do resync and a page had changed then the page would get
sent again, which the d
